Luke Hooper vs Philip Henning Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 May at 09:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Hooper vs P. Henning

GBR
0
Win
Played
0
Win

RSA
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hooper 0 - 0 Henning
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hooper | 0 |
| Henning | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
L. Hooper vs P. Henning H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Titles | 12 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Hooper vs P. Henning Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Hooper has outperformed Henning on second serve points, winning 44.34%, compared to Henning's 40.66%. Does this give Hooper a significant advantage? Perhaps, as this metric often correlates with match outcomes.
- Return Game: Henning wins 42.18% of opponents' second serve points, slightly trailing Hooper at 43.08%. However, Henning leads in first serve return points at 26.79% versus Hooper's 23.03%, potentially indicating stronger return skills under pressure.
- Under Pressure: In high-stress scenarios, Hooper saves 55.48% of breakpoints while Henning saves 53.7%. This suggests Hooper might have a slight edge in handling critical moments during matches.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Henning has a higher win rate at 70.59% (W/L 48/20) compared to Hooper's 63.27% (W/L 31/18), suggesting more consistent overall performance.
- Surface Preference: Henning thrives on Hard courts with an 80% win rate, while Hooper excels on Indoor Hard courts at 65%. Surface could influence performance, especially if the upcoming match is on one of these surfaces.
- Event Level & Opponent Quality: Henning has chiefly competed in lower-tier events but boasts an 86.05% win rate. Hooper, facing higher-ranked opponents, has played against an average rank of 254.39 over the past year.
- Deciding Set Performance: Hooper prevails in 50% of deciding sets, slightly outperforming Henning, who has a 41% win rate in such situations.
- Break Point Conversion: For breaking opponents’ serves, Henning has a conversion rate of 34.71%, more efficient compared to Hooper's 27.4%.
Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):
Both players demonstrate strengths in different areas, making this an intriguing matchup. Henning's superior performance on Hard courts, coupled with a higher break point conversion rate, suggests strong potential in capitalizing on opponents' weaknesses.
However, Hooper's advantage in facing higher-ranked opponents, combined with a better recent second serve performance and breakpoint-saving ability, indicates resilience under pressure.
Considering recent trends and performance patterns, Henning appears to have a slight edge overall, potentially making them the favorite to win this upcoming match against Hooper.
Luke Hooper vs Philip Henning Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
L. Hooper Recent Matches Played
P. Henning Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||

L. Hooper vs P. Henning Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0/0) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.93% (123/39) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 71.78% (262/103) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 59.05% (1955/1356) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 80.31% (102/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.16% (12/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 471 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 187 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:30:44 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.78 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 66% (6036/9179) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4305/6036) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (1780/3143) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (530/1142) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4316/9993) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (12/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 83.97% (110/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 76% (123/162) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (25/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (25/41) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (116/109) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (116/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (46/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
