Luke Hooper vs Philip Henning Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 May at 09:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Hooper vs P. Henning

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hooper 1 - 0 Henning
They have played 2 sets in total, with Luke Hooper winning 2 and Philip Henning winning 0. The last match between Luke Hooper and Philip Henning was at the M25 Nottingham, 07-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Luke Hooper getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Hooper | 1 |
Henning | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Nottingham(05-07-25)
L. Hooper vs P. Henning H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.33% (42-30) | Career Total W/L | 75.33% (113-37) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
0 | Titles | 11 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Hooper vs P. Henning Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Hooper has outperformed Henning on second serve points, winning 44.34%, compared to Henning's 40.66%. Does this give Hooper a significant advantage? Perhaps, as this metric often correlates with match outcomes.
- Return Game: Henning wins 42.18% of opponents' second serve points, slightly trailing Hooper at 43.08%. However, Henning leads in first serve return points at 26.79% versus Hooper's 23.03%, potentially indicating stronger return skills under pressure.
- Under Pressure: In high-stress scenarios, Hooper saves 55.48% of breakpoints while Henning saves 53.7%. This suggests Hooper might have a slight edge in handling critical moments during matches.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Henning has a higher win rate at 70.59% (W/L 48/20) compared to Hooper's 63.27% (W/L 31/18), suggesting more consistent overall performance.
- Surface Preference: Henning thrives on Hard courts with an 80% win rate, while Hooper excels on Indoor Hard courts at 65%. Surface could influence performance, especially if the upcoming match is on one of these surfaces.
- Event Level & Opponent Quality: Henning has chiefly competed in lower-tier events but boasts an 86.05% win rate. Hooper, facing higher-ranked opponents, has played against an average rank of 254.39 over the past year.
- Deciding Set Performance: Hooper prevails in 50% of deciding sets, slightly outperforming Henning, who has a 41% win rate in such situations.
- Break Point Conversion: For breaking opponents’ serves, Henning has a conversion rate of 34.71%, more efficient compared to Hooper's 27.4%.
Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):
Both players demonstrate strengths in different areas, making this an intriguing matchup. Henning's superior performance on Hard courts, coupled with a higher break point conversion rate, suggests strong potential in capitalizing on opponents' weaknesses.
However, Hooper's advantage in facing higher-ranked opponents, combined with a better recent second serve performance and breakpoint-saving ability, indicates resilience under pressure.
Considering recent trends and performance patterns, Henning appears to have a slight edge overall, potentially making them the favorite to win this upcoming match against Hooper.
Luke Hooper vs Philip Henning Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Hooper vs P. Henning H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:55:32 | Average Match Time | 1:55:32 |
68% (52/76) | 1st Serve % | 75% (61/81) |
77% (40/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (43/61) |
58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
17% (1/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
35% (28/81) | Return Points Win % | 29% (22/76) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Hooper Recent Matches Played
P. Henning Recent Matches Played

L. Hooper vs P. Henning Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.33% (42/30) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.33% (113/37) |
58.33% (91/65) | Sets Win/Loss | 71.30% (241/97) |
53.79% (802/689) | Games Win/Loss | 58.76% (1817/1275) |
54.90% (28/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 80.00% (92/23) |
0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.16% (12/7) |
66.67% (14/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (9/7) |
0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
185 | Aces Total | 446 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
174 | Total Double Faults | 171 |
1:9:14 | Average Match Time | 1:29:56 |
213.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.18 |
59% (1909/3231) | 1st Serve % | 66% (5627/8536) |
69% (1320/1909) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4013/5627) |
51% (670/1322) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (1658/2909) |
39% (123/312) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (478/1044) |
39% (1253/3197) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3966/9277) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (12/14) |
58.33% (42/30) | Futures W/L | 84.03% (100/19) |
58% (41/71) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (113/150) |
43% (6/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (25/42) |
38% (5/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (23/38) |
91% (45/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (105/99) |
9% (45/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (105/6) |
4% (27/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (45/14) |